Reforming Economics and Finance in the Light of Abrahamic Principles

Posted on 1st July 2015 by Camille Silla Paldi,

Reforming Finance and Economics in Light of the Abrahamic Principles

By Camille Paldi



The modern day economic system is built upon and around interest-based lending, which allows one class of people to grow rich at the expense of the majority of the population. Interest has been prohibited in all Abrahamic religions for essentially the same reasons, which includes the well-being of humanity, the avoidance of segregating society into the oppressor and oppressed, and encouraging productive trade, economic growth, and the egalitarian distribution and flow of money throughout all segments of society. When the economic structure is engineered in a manner, which allows people to make money from money in an unproductive activity, this enables and encourages some people to exploit the majority for profit without doing any work. In this set-up, money is essentially created out of nothing by private banks rather than governments and the people exist on a giant Ponzi scheme of debt, which slowly erodes their wealth through inflation and deflation as the supply of money does not match goods and services in society.  The people essentially becomes slaves to the private banks who are printing money and then lending it out with interest. These banks create money out of nothing and then manipulate the interest rates, inflation, and deflation with the aim of maximizing their own wealth and the wealth of the bank’s shareholders. When the supply of money does not match the goods and services produced in society, inflation is created and fueled. Inflation decreases one’s purchasing power while deflation decreases the value of the currency. As one can see, inflation combined with deflation in an economic structure built upon and around interest-based lending and fractional reserve banking is a no- win situation for the vast majority of the population of the planet. If this scheme continues, the end result may be a small percentage of extremely wealthy people controlling an extremely poor majority in an environmentally degraded and polluted atmosphere and planet. This structure is not sustainable in the long-run, however, contains many benefits for a select few in the immediate short-run. An ideal economy would have the state issue gold and silver currency or fiat money backed by gold or silver.  The state would create an amount of money that matched the corresponding goods, services, and assets in society.    This may stabilize prices, the purchasing power of the citizens, the value of the currency, as well as encourage money-commodity and commodity transactions rather than money-money transactionss thereby inducing growth, productive trade, and the flourishing of business. 


The prohibition of usury can be found in the Torah between Jews in Judaism.  However, the overall prohibition of usury amongst all people has strong roots in the Bible and Christianity.  Lending money is not prohibited in the Bible. What is prohibited is charging abusively high interest. This is because high-interest loans tend to prey on the most under resourced people in society. God strongly rebukes usury because it oppresses the poor. The Bible also teaches us to be very cautious regarding borrowing money. This is because “the borrower is the slave of the lender” (Proverbs 22:7). Once we borrow money we are beholding to the lender — and this can be a form of slavery God wants us to avoid.


Riba (interest) was prohibited in both Judaism and Christianity long before Islam and the Qu’ran is just re-stating what the two previous Holy Books have already mentioned. In fact, many of the economic principles in Islam can be traced back through the Holy Books to the messages expounded by Jesus (p.b.u.h.) and Moses (p.b.u.h.). Choudhury explains,


“Indeed, to protect society’s integrity and means of self-support for its members, every religion in history perceived that the system of usury was opposed to the proper workings of society.” (Choudhury, 2007:59).  Islamic banking can in fact be seen as a form of Abrahamic or Holy Book Banking, encompassing principles found in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. This idea is further supported by the fact that the concept of Risalah in Islam is based on the teachings of all of God’s prophets including Muhammad (s.a.w.), Jesus (p.b.u.h.), Moses (p.b.u.h.), and Abraham (p.b.u.h.), the Bible, Torah, Qu’ran and Sunnah.


The Abrahamic banking system should reflect the teachings of all of God’s prophets including Abraham, Moses, Jesus, David, and Muhammad (s.a.w.) and the Torah, Bible, and Qu’ran.  God’s messages were delivered to earth at different times in history through various messengers, the first being through Moses in the 1525-1405 BC, the second through Jesus who lived approximately between 4 BC – 30 AD, and between 572- 632 AD through Muhammad (s.a.w.). The deliverance of these messages through different messengers at different times of history was not meant to divide the believing people, however, believers should be unified through the stories of the Book, which correspond and correlate with each other in terms of events, characters, and messages and is in fact a continuation of the same story through different periods of time and history. 


Abrahamic principles center around the belief in God as well the prohibition of interest and usury. Christianity varies the principle of monotheism by advocating that Jesus is the son of God and the Holy Trinity. Christianity and Islam are in fact two separate streams of light from the same source. This was recognized by the King of Abyssinia or Ethiopia during the first Hijrah when 83 of the first followers of Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h.), the Sahabah, sought refuge from persecution of the Quraysh in Mecca in Abyssnia. The King of Abyssnia proclaimed that Christianity and Islam were in fact two streams of light from the same origin and thus granted refuge to the Muslims for 15 years, from 7 BH (615 CE) to AH 7 (628/629) taking into the account the similarity between Christian and Islamic beliefs and values. The King of Abyssnia at this time, known in Arabic as Ashama ibn Abjar was a Christian who was considered well-known for being a just and God-fearing man and spiritual leader. Christians and Muslims do indeed worship the same God through different avenues, thought-processes, rituals, lenses, and forms of prayer and hold similar beliefs and compassionate values. Muslims recognize Jesus as a Prophet, however, acknowledge Muhammad (S.A.W.) as the last and final Prophet of God, the seal of all Prophets. Jews do not recognize Muhammad (S.A.W.) as the last and final Prophet of God and also believe that Uzair, the scribe of the Torah, was the son of God. Therefore, in regards to the people of the Holy Book, Muslims remain the sole group, which believe in the oneness of God and monotheism and acknowledge all three segments of the Holy Book and all of God’s Prophets. This is the main reason why in fact many Christians and Jews convert to Islam and not vice versa as many discover that Islam is in fact the last chapter of the Holy Book, completing the story.


In light of this background, what then will economics and finance look like if reformed in the light of Abrahamic principles? What if we molded an economic structure with Shariáh, Christian, and Jewish law, values, and principles and removed interest from the financial structures thereby transforming the entire economy from one based on a creditor/debtor relationship and interest-based loans to one based on partnership, productive trade, and profit and loss sharing utilizing gold and silver currency issued by the government?  The Abrahamic structure may create a stable economy based on real assets and productive interactions between finance houses and people in a partnership format where profit and loss are shared between the parties in a business venture. This structure allows the economy to grow and expand, stabilizes the value of currency and prices, and encourages the distribution of wealth across a broader cross- section of society.  The supply of money backed by gold and silver or gold and silver itself matches the supply of goods and services in society, reducing inflation, and preserving one’s purchasing power.  More people may become owners and participative members of the economic system and small to medium sized businesses may be able to compete with mega-corporations. 


Similar to the ideas found in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, Western philosophers such as Aristotle (384-322 BCE), who preceded Christ, considered interest an unnatural income because the lender gains without performing any work. Aristotle believed that money cannot beget money similar to Islamic belief and ideas found in all of the Holy Books. According to Aristotle, there are three ways of seeking profit in business: (1) Through natural trade, that is, through the exchange of essential commodities in daily transactions; (2) Through the exchange of essential commodities for money. This form of trading is practiced in modern society; and (3) Through unnatural trade where money is treated as a commodity that can be traded (rather than as a means of exchange). The profit realized from such a trade is classified as interest. (Abdullah and Chee, 2010:39) This fiscal knowledge actually amounts to financial common sense and fiscal logic as well as a deep philosophical insight into economic structures and monetary policy and the impact of such structures and policies.  


Islam Explains Why Interest is Prohibited in the Bible and Torah

Although the prohibition of usury can be traced back to the Torah between Jews and amongst all humanity in the Bible and Christianity, Islam takes the discourse on interest one step further than Judaism and Christianity and explains in detail why exactly interest is prohibited throughout all of the chapters of the Holy Book. In Islam, it is permissible to trade money for commodity, commodity for commodity, however, not money for money as this produces riba (interest). Riba (interest) is in fact just a form of gharar (uncertainty). The philosophical and conceptual foundations behind the prohibition on riba (interest) can be derived through the Shuratic process in discursive interpretation of the Qu’ran and Sunnah as well as in the Islamic concept of Risalah, which states that Muslims should adhere to the teachings of all of God’s prophets including Abraham (pbuh), Moses (pbuh), Jesus (pbuh), and Muhammad (pbuh).  All of God’s prophets prohibited riba and this is clearly stated in all of the chapters of the Holy Book, including the Torah, the Bible, and the Qu’ran. The prohibition of riba can therefore be considered a Holy Book concept and a common and unifying theme amongst all of the people of the Holy Book. All Abrahamic religions and faiths ban interest as it is believed that producing money from money is an unproductive activity, which leads to the exploitation of human beings by other human beings, conflict, and societal and environmental decay. Money should be generated from productive activities, which helps the economy to grow and expand. Therefore, in all modes of Islamic finance, interest is absent and risk and profit and loss are shared between the parties to the contract.

The Shari’ah allows for transactions where both counter-values are transacted at the time of the dealing or one counter-value now and one in the future, however, not both counter-values in the future as this creates gharar (uncertainty) about the fulfillment of the contract. However, this is allowed where the benefit outweighs the harm. 

Since in interest financing, one counter-value is certain, the interest on the loan, and one counter-value is uncertain, the yield from investing the loan by the creditor, interest-finance is in fact an extreme case of gharar (uncertainty) and is prohibited under the Shari’ah as the harm outweighs the benefit. Saadallah says that in the case of riba (interest), the “variance in certitude between the two counter-values, the interest on the one hand and the opportunity cost on the other, constitutes the essence of the injustice of imposing interest on loans” (2009:111). Debt-finance replicates the result of interest-based financing and does not fulfill the requirements of the Shari’ah. Dusuki says “For a contract to be valid, there should be Iwadh or counter value present. Three elements of iwadh that should exist are risk (ghorm), work and effort (ikhtiar) and liability (daman). In the majority of debt-financing contracts, one or more of these elements of Iwadh are missing. If there is no risk, effort and liability, then such a contract cannot be considered to contain any element of justice” (2011:3). 

Ridha Saadallah states that an often-cited reason for the Qu’ranic ban on interest is to “forestall injustice, since increasing the amount is in return of the time-term” (2009:111). Islam does not recognize the time value of money as time cannot be the sole consideration for an excess amount claimed in an exchange. Saadaallah says the excess amount must be claimed against an asset or commodity and not time as this would result in a money-money transaction. Taqi Usmani explains “Time of payment may act as an ancillary factor to determine the price of a commodity, but it cannot act as an exclusive basis for and the sole consideration of an excess claimed in exchange of money for money” (2000:10). Commodity-commodity and money-commodity transactions are allowed, however, not money-money transactions as this may result in (riba) interest. Interest financing leads to a false economy, creating instability, inflation, unemployment, and cyclical crashes. Islamic finance is asset-backed, which creates a real economy with real assets and inventories and promotes stability as well as creates an economy where speculators and bankers cannot crash markets for profit through greedy and reckless behavior. According to Taqi Usmani “Interest-based financing does not necessarily create real assets, therefore, the supply of money through the loans advanced by the financial institutions does not normally match with the real goods and services produced in the society, because the supply is increased, and sometimes multiplied without creating real assets in the same quantity” (2011:10). Usmani explains that “This gap between the supply of money and production of real assets creates or fuels inflation” (2011:10). In contrast, Usmani says “Since financing in an Islamic system is backed by assets, it is always matched with corresponding goods and services” (2011:10). 

In an interest- based loan, the creditor receives a fixed rate of return no matter how much profit or loss the venture makes. If the venture makes a lot of money, the creditor receives a fixed rate of return. It would be more just if the creditor shared in the profits rather than just receiving a low fixed rate of return in the form of interest. If the venture makes a loss, the creditor still receives a fixed rate of return and the debtor bears the risk of the loss. It would be more equitable if the creditor shared in the loss rather than receiving an abnormally high rate of return in the form of interest. Riba (interest) results in a financial system where the debtors bear the majority of the risk and the creditor most of the reward. 

According to Sheikh Wahba al Zuhayli, “Riba is a surplus of commodity without counter-value in commutative transaction of property for property” (2006:25). The intent of such a transaction is a surplus of commodities. Therefore, the definition of riba includes both credit riba and invalid sales, since postponement in either of the indemnities is a legal surplus without perceivable material recompense, the delay usually due to an increase in compensation (Zuhayli, 2006:25). In Islam, money – money transactions are not allowed and there is no time value of money concept. Taqi Usmani explains that “Any excess amount charged against late payment is riba only where the subject- matter is money on both sides” (2011:10). Furthermore, “Any excess claimed in a credit transaction (of money exchange of money) is against nothing but time” (Usmani, 2011: 10). 

There are two types of riba forbidden in Islam, credit and surplus riba. “Credit riba is taken against a delay in settlement of a due debt, regardless whether the debt be that of goods sold or a loan” (Zuhayli, 2006: 26). Therefore, “Credit riba occurs due to their inclusion of an increase in one of the two exchanged goods without any counter-value (Zuhayli, 2006: 28). The impermissibility of exchanging equal amounts is due to the resulting increase in value. Zuhayli explains that this is because neither of the contracting parties would usually accept to postpone the receiving of the payment save if there were some benefit by increase in the value thereby (Zuhayli, 2006: 28). Credit riba represents a violation of the ‘hand to hand’ rule when one or both counter-values of a transaction are postponed to a future date (of goods of same genus). Riba of delay or credit riba prohibits sale of commodities in the future even if the counter- values are equal (Ahmed, 2011:32). 

Ubida b. al-Simit (Allah be pleased with him) reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: Gold is to be paid for by gold, silver by silver, wheat by wheat, barley by barley, dates by dates, and salt by salt, like for like and equal for equal, payment being made hand to hand. If these classes differ, then sell as you wish if payment is made hand to hand (Muslim, book 10, number 3853) (Visser, 2009: 34). 

The six goods mentioned in this hadith are ribawi goods. Violation of “same for same” can lead to riba of excess (riba al fadl) or surplus riba and not fulfilling “hand to hand” (i.e. spot transaction) would constitute riba of delay (riba al nasi’ah) or credit riba (Ahmed, 2011: 31). Furthermore, “gold for gold” and “silver for silver” provides the rules of monetary exchange (sarf) during this time (Ahmed, 2011:31). If there is exchange among the same specie of ribawi goods, it has to be done on the spot and should be of equal quantities (Ahmed, 2011:31). If the quantities exchanged differ, even in spot transactions, then it will constitute riba of excess (riba al fadl) or surplus riba (Ahmed, 2011:31). Rules of riba of excess also prohibit exchange of dissimilar quantities of a genus with different qualities (such as exchanging one unit of high quality dates with two units of low quality dates) (Ahmed, 2011:31).

Zuhayli says that “Surplus riba is the sale of similar items with a disparity in amount in the six canonically-forbidden categories of goods; gold, silver, wheat, barley, salt, and dry dates” (2006: 26). It is the violation of the ‘equal for equal’ rule in spot transactions of the same goods of a particular genus. Zuhayli explains that “This type of riba is forbidden in order to prevent it being used as a pretext to committing credit riba, such that a person sells gold, for example, on credit, then pays back in silver more than the equivalent of what he had taken in gold” (2006: 26). To avoid riba, the commodity has to be exchanged with some other genus and then traded with the desired commodity (high quality dates with wheat or silver and then wheat or silver with low quality dates) (Ahmed, 2011: 32). 

Narrated by Abu Said Al-Khudri and Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle appointed somebody as a governor of Khaibar. That governor brought to him an excellent kind of dates (from Khaibar). The Prophet asked, ‘Are all the dates of Khaibar like this?’ He replied, ‘By Allah, no, Oh Allah’s Apostle! But we bartered one Sa of this type (type of dates) for two Sas of dates of ours and two Sas of it for three of ours.’ Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Do not do so (as that is a kind of usury) but sell the mixed dates (of inferior quality) for money, and then buy good dates with that money’ (Bukhari, vol. 3, book 34, no. 405; see also Muslim, book 10, number 3875)(Visser, 2009:34). 


An economy which grows debt from debt cannot grow, but can only retract, causing the value of money to decrease, forcing people out of businesses, increasing the number of homeless, and forcing more and more people to struggle with their daily existence as the people become entrapped in a debt bubble, which eventually surrounds them and encapsulates their entire lives. Islamic finance is based on real assets and a real and productive economy. As Islamic finance is now booming around the world, we are presented with a momentous occasion for all of God’s people to join together in an effort to bring about divine finance in the light of Abrahamic principles in order to create a productive, just, and equitable system for all.

Prohibition of Interest in the Bible and Qu’ran

Clear injunctions can be found throughout the Bible as well against interest and usury or lending at exorbitant interest rates.

Exodus 22:25 

Leviticus 25:35 

Leviticus 25:36 

Deuteronomy 15:7 

Deuteronomy 23:19

Deuteronomy 23:20

Psalm 15:5

Proverbs 28:8

Jeremiah 15:10

Ezekiel 18:8

Ezekiel 18:13

In Kings 4:1,7,

In Nehemiah 5:2-5,7,10,


Surah al-Baqarah (2:275) of the Qu’ran also prohibits interest and states that, “Those who consume interest cannot stand [on the Day of Resurrection] except as one stands who is being beaten by Satan into insanity. That is because they say, "Trade is [just] like interest." But Allah has permitted trade and has forbidden interest. So whoever has received an admonition from his Lord and desists may have what is past, and his affair rests with Allah. But whoever returns to [dealing in interest or usury] - those are the companions of the Fire; they will abide eternally therein.” The Qu’ran uses strong language to prohibit interest such as that Allah will wage a war on those who touch the dust of interest due to the fact that the moneylenders are in fact waging a war on humanity through charging interest on loans. The moneylenders are exploiting the masses for profit and stealing their wealth with the aim of first turning the masses into slaves and then eventually homeless beggars through the tool of oppression called interest.


The Abrahamic Economy

Through using a system of knowledge based on a tawhid One-God epistemology we can deduce a set of moral teachings, which should guide us in the creation of a distinct Abrahamic economy. Choudhury explains that, “The unifying worldview is derived from the epistemology and ontology of Divine Unity… We thus have the epistemology of Divine Unity and the unification process of knowledge emanating from Divine Unity” (2001:3).  According to Professor Mehmet Asutay, the basic principles of this Abrahamic economy based on the tawhid One-God World view and Risalah or the teachings of all of God’s prophets include the prohibition of interest (Riba) with the objective of providing a stable and socially efficient economic environment and prohibition of fixed return on nominal transactions with the aim of creating productive economic activity or asset-based financing as opposed to the debt-based system. In this Abrahamic economy, Asutay explains that money does not have any inherent value in itself and therefore it cannot be created through the credit system. Asutay asserts that the principle of ‘profit and loss sharing’ (PLS) and hence ‘risk sharing’ is the essential axis around which economic and business activity takes places. Asutay says that this prevents the capital owner from shifting the entire risk onto the borrower and hence it aims at establishing justice between work, effort, and return and between work, effort, and capital. Asutay reveals that an important consequence of the PLS concept is the participatory nature of economic and business activity, as Islamic banking and finance instruments, capital, and labor merges to establish partnerships through their individual contributions. Asutay concludes that essentializing productive economic and business activity, uncertainty, speculation and gambling is also prohibited with the same rationale of emphasizing asset-based productive economic activity over a debt-based system where money is made from unproductive activity (Asutay, 2012:20).




It may be surprising to learn that the US Constitution says that each state shall issue currency in gold and silver and that Thomas Jefferson, one of the founding fathers of the United States of America, extensively studied the Qu’ran and valued and respected the principles of justice, equality, and economics found within the Holy Book. President Kennedy respected the US Constitution and in his role as President of the United States attempted to restore the power to issue currency from the Federal Reserve to the US government in the form of silver certificates, however, Executive Order 11110 was never implemented due to his untimely death.  


"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered...I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies... The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." -Thomas Jefferson.









Abdullah, David Vicary and Keon Chee (2010). Islamic Finance: Why It Makes Sense, Understanding Its’ Principles and Practices. Marshall Cavendish International (Asia).

Ahmed, Habib (2011). Product Development in Islamic Banks. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.

Ahmed, Habib (2012). ‘A Different Perspective on the Financial Crisis,’ Papers of DialogueAgenzia Italia, 18-19.

Asutay, Mehmet (2007). “Conceptualization of the Second Best Solution in Overcoming the Social Failure of Islamic Banking and Finance, Examining the Overpowering of Homoislamicus by Homoeconomicus.” IIUM Journal of Economics and Management 15, no. 2, 167- 195.

Asutay, Mehmet (2007). “A Political Economy Approach to Islamic Economics: Systemic Understanding for an Alternative Economic System.” Kyoto Bulletin Of Islamic Area Studies, 1-2, 3 – 18.

Asutay, Mehmet (2012). “Islamic Economics: Between Aspirations and Reality.” Papers of Dialogue, Agenzia Italia, 20-23.

Chapra, Muhammad Umer (2008).  The Islamic Vision of Development in the Light of Maqasid al-Shari’ah.  London: International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Choudhury, Masudul Alam (2007). The Islamic World System, A Study in Polity-Market Interaction.  Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

Dien, Mawil Izzi (2004).  Islamic Law, From Historical Foundations to Contemporary Practice.  Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki and Said Bouheraoua, The Framework of the Maqasid Al Shari’ah (Objectives of the Shari’ah and Its Implications for Islamic Finance), ISRA Research Paper No. 22/2011.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim (2011).  Shari’ah Law: An Introduction.  Oxford, England: One World Publications.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim (2000).  Islamic Commercial Law.  Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.

Saadallah, Ridha (2009).  Concept of Time in Islamic Economics, IRTI Research Paper 81-102.

Usmani, Mufti Taqi (2000).  Introduction to Islamic Finance. Karachi: Dar Uloom Karachi.

Visser, Hans (2009).  Islamic Finance Principles and Practice. Edward Elgar: UK.

Vogel and Hayes (2006). Islamic Law and Finance: Religion, Risk, and Return.  Lieden:Brill.


Zuhayli, Sheikh Wahba (2006). “The Juridicial Meaning of Riba,” in Interest in Islamic Economics (pp. 25 – 52).  Thomas Routledge: New York.



Posted on 1st July 2015 by Camille Silla Paldi

Comment on this post


    • 15th October @camille paldi
    • Paloma and Jill
    • 14th October @camille paldi
    • Auntie Camille bought me boba tea!
    • 14th October @camille paldi
    • Black Bean Noodles
    • 22nd September @camille paldi
    • Sev and Paloms
    • 17th September @camille paldi
    • Cooked Beef Wellington!
    • 9th September @camille paldi
    • 25th August @camille paldi
    • Beirut
    • 25th August @camille paldi
    • Dubai
    • 25th August @camille paldi
    • Ramadan 2010 Dubai
    • 25th August @camille paldi
    • Dubai during Ramadan 2010
    • 17th August @camille paldi
    • 16th August @camille paldi
    • Studying Arabic in Dubai with Lena Yazbeck in 2010. Good memories - Dubai.
    • 1st August @camille paldi
    • RT @TIME: "A special bond." Identical twin brothers to marry identical twin sisters
    • 1st August @camille paldi
    • One week without Facebook!
    • 30th July @camille paldi
    • Nice French restaurant in Sausalito.
    • 29th July @camille paldi
    • Sausalito
    • 27th July @camille paldi
    • RT @chasejarvis: I’m gonna go hang with @JoeMcNallyPhoto next week. You going?
    • 27th July @camille paldi
    • RT @chasejarvis: State what you want, and then BE RELENTLESS. ⚡️⚡️⚡️
    • 26th July @camille paldi
    • Deactivated facebook. Feel much better, what a relief!
    • 15th July @camille paldi


Camille Paldi (FAAIF) Participates in Sapporo 2016 International Congress on Banking, Economics, Finance, and Business, June 24-26, 2016.

Camille Paldi (FAAIF) Participates in Sapporo 2016 International Congress on Banking, Economics, Finance, and Business, June 24-26, 2016.

Camille Paldi (FAAIF) Participates in Sapporo 2016 International Congress on Banking, Economics, Finance, and Business, June 24-26, 2016.


Camille Paldi, CEO of the Franco-American Alliance for Islamic Finance (FAAIF), participated in the 2016 International Congress on...

Posted on 13th July 2016 by Camille Paldi

Camille Paldi, CEO of FAAIF, participates in the 2016 International Symposium on Economics and Social Sciences in Kyoto, Japan.

Camille Paldi, CEO of FAAIF, participates in the 2016 International Symposium on Economics and Social Sciences in Kyoto, Japan.

Camille Paldi, CEO of FAAIF, participates in the 2016 International Symposium on Economics and Social Sciences in Kyoto, Japan.


Camille Paldi, CEO of FAAIF or the Franco-American Alliance for Islamic Finance, discussed the modes of Islamic finance plus sukuk, taka...

Posted on 13th July 2016 by Camille Paldi

Challenges in Infrastructure Financing in Developing Countries: An Islamic Approach, Substituting Equity and Sukuks to Debt

Challenges in Infrastructure Financing in Developing Countries: An Islamic Approach, Substituting Equity and Sukuks to Debt

Challenges in Infrastructure Financing in Developing Countries: An Islamic Approach, Substituting Equity and Sukuks to Debt

 Posted on 1st July 2016 by Noureddine Krichene and Camille Paldi

Book Review for Asset Based Financing by Dr. Muhammad Hanif

Book Review for Asset Based Financing by Dr. Muhammad Hanif

Book Review for Asset Based Financing by Dr. Muhammad Hanif


Camille Paldi


Find all our videos here, and also a link to our YouTube video channel so you can view our 'video of the week'


We would like you to get involved with our site. So if you want to submit Articles, Videos, Events and Call for Papers, please click the button below:


Valid XHTML 1.1 |  Valid CSS |  Web Design in Durham and Newcastle |  Copyright © 2018

* Prices are converted at USD$0.2723 per AED 1